← Search

Cara Moore

EUREKA, MO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
259 matches · 158W–101L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Cara Moore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history259 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Peterson-Strasheim (F) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
Sue Adams / Karen Walker
2026-09-12 · Burkart/Rechtlich · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Eckenrodt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-29 · Peterson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Strasheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · Peterson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Strasheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-01 · Peterson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Strasheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · Peterson/Moore (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Eckenrodt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-20 · Peterson/Moore (SD) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · Peterson/Moore (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Strasheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-06 · Peterson/Moore (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Eckenrodt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-03-22 · Peterson/Moore (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paula Bauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-16 · Peterson/Moore (SD) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-15 · Peterson/Moore (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Strasheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
60.9%
157W–101L · 53.9% of games
6.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
106 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
93 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
50 matches
#2 Singles
4%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams