← Search

Jill Moore

— year-end
65 matches · 30W–35L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jill Moore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-07-25 · SOAKS MOORE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsten Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-07-11 · SOAKS MOORE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cecilia Gallardo Solano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · SOAKS MOORE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annette Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-06 · SOAKS MOORE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annette Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
Jennifer Lucas / Kimberly Knox
2026-05-30 · SOAKS MOORE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annette Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-24 · Moore · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Annette Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-23 · Moore · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kim Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-5
L
2026-05-23 · Moore · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Annette Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-22 · Moore · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Stokes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · Dorado Sabanera · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tatiana Pagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-19 · SOAKS MOORE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Keller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-12 · SOAKS MOORE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cecilia Gallardo Solano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
Teams35 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
46.8%
22W–25L · 51.1% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 42.9% of games
7.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 40.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
11 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams