← Search

Kim Bell

— year-end
105 matches · 55W–50L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Kim Bell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
L
2026-09-12 · SOAKS MOORE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Uptmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-25 · SOAKS MOORE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lola Gomez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · TCU CARDENAS · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Conner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-18 · SOAKS MOORE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Keller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-03 · TCU CARDENAS · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Conner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · TCU CARDENAS · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janie Stephanow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-25 · TCU CARDENAS · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Cardenas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-20 · SOAKS MOORE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcel Kerr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-01 · TCU SCOTT · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-05-30 · SOAKS MOORE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cecilia Gallardo Solano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-29 · TCU CARDENAS · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-05-24 · Moore · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
Teams33 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
50%
4W–4L · 54.4% of games
3.5
48.9%
22W–23L · 50.5% of games
4.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 62% of games
6.0
92.9%
13W–1L · 66.1% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 46.6% of games
7.0
29.2%
7W–17L · 41.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
23 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe