Jeff Petersen
West Jordan, UT
53 matches · 22W–31L · seasons 2022–2024
Captains: add Jeff Petersen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history53 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
Brian Smith / Aaron Schinke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-2
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2022–2024
Liberty Park Tennis-Law
Liberty Park Tennis-Noyce
Liberty Park-Ray/Lyon
RISE AC-Higgs
Liberty Park Tennis-Day/Torres
Liberty Park Tennis-Noyce
Liberty Park Tennis-Torres
Liberty Park Tennis-Torres/Richardson
Liberty Park Tennis-Visser
Salt Lake Tennis-Higgs
South Jordan-Christensen/Larkin
South Jordan-Christensen
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
30%
9W–21L · 40% of games
5.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.3% of games
6.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 57.1% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
40%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
11 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.