← Search

Julie Long

— year-end
34 matches · 15W–19L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Julie Long to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Yadkin/Ferrell-Girard/40+6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nora Ferrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-09-08 · Yadkin/Kaplan/18+6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with JoAnn White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-01 · Yadkin/Kaplan/18+6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Kaplan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-27 · Yadkin/Ferrell-Girard/40+6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Starnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-25 · Yadkin/Kaplan/18+6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with JoAnn White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-30 · Yadkin/Blackwell/18+3.0 Mixed · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chuck Long mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
Amy Braden / William Burns
2026-06-09 · Yadkin/Blackwell/18+3.0 Mixed · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Drew Blackwell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-02 · Yadkin/Blackwell/18+3.0 Mixed · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Glontz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-05-07 · Yadkin/Jennings/40+3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Braden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-04 · Yadkin/Jennings/40+3.0 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Gregory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-28 · Yadkin/Jennings/18+3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristie Moesner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-21 · Yadkin/Jennings/18+3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lela Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Teams25 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.2% of games
3.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.4% of games
6.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 44.7% of games
3.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams