← Search

Suzanne Rackleff

— year-end
85 matches · 61W–24L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Suzanne Rackleff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Hayes/IS/Day3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Briana Schrieber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-31 · Evans/IS/Day3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barb Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-28 · Hendrix/LF/tri 4.0 W DAY · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Hunt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-16 · Hayes/IS/mixed 8.0 tri · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Corey Wilson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · Hendrix/LF/tri 4.0 W DAY · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leah Jappe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · Hendrix/LF/tri 4.0 W DAY · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amber Hendrix
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · Hendrix/LF/tri 4.0 W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Hunt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
Rhonda Hoffman / John Lee
2026-07-19 · Hayes/IS/mixed 8.0 tri · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Aaron Hayes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-16 · Hendrix/LF/tri 4.0 W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Hunt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · Orange/Rackleff/IS 18s 3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barb Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-20 · Hayes/IS 18s 3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-14 · Hayes/IS 18s 3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Madison Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Teams24 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
92.9%
13W–1L · 74% of games
3.0
68.3%
28W–13L · 60.6% of games
3.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 56.1% of games
5.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 55.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
20 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer