← Search

Jared Coe

Tulsa, OK
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 19W–43L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Jared Coe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Schuster/LF/40&over3.0M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cailean Carlberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-09-04 · Stone/GR/mixed tri · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jill Croka mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Ashley Humphrey / John Lee
2026-09-01 · Stone/GR/mixed tri · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Hayli Leavitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · Stone/GR/mixed tri · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Julie Remy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-14 · Stone/GR/mixed tri · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kendall Ellsworth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-20 · Gilbert/LF 18s 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelley Elam mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-07-17 · Stone/GR/mixed tri · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kendall Ellsworth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · Gilbert/LF 18s 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sthephanie Mab mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-26 · Gilbert/LF 18s 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melinda Young mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-08 · Tauber/LF 18s 3.0M · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephen Brocks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-04 · Tauber/LF 18s 3.0M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nick Blackwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-01 · Tauber/LF 18s 3.0M · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nick Blackwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
28.6%
8W–20L · 37.8% of games
5.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.8% of games
5.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
32%
8W–17L · 42.3% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
11 matches
#1 Singles
7%
4 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer