← Search

Mary Tanner Sanders

— year-end
33 matches · 20W–13L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Mary Tanner Sanders to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
W
2026-08-25 · LKWD - Huffty / Barnard · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Lafitte Buster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-04-22 · LKWD - Huffty / Barnard · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Effie Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-03-31 · LKWD - Huffty / Barnard · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Effie Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-02-11 · LkWD - Snead · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Barnard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-21 · LkWD - Snead · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Spinks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-09-29 · LKWD - Winstead/Carpenter · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2025-03-12 · LKWD - Clarke/Snead · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Roberson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2025-02-27 · LKWD - Winstead/Carpenter · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelley Springer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
Katie White
2025-02-12 · LKWD - Clarke/Snead · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-02-10 · LKWD - Winstead/Carpenter · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pam Stein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-02-03 · LKWD - Winstead/Carpenter · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Winstead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-01-15 · LKWD - Clarke/Snead · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Teams15 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
55.6%
15W–12L · 51.9% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 27% of the time
#2 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#1 Singles
21%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
3 matches
#2 Singles
9%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer