← Search

Amy Kranz

Fairhope, AL
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 7W–35L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Amy Kranz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
L
2026-07-29 · Fairhope - Rogers · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Charlotte Holland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-14 · Fairhope - Rogers · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jenna Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-07 · Fairhope - Rogers · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sarah Hollis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-10 · Fairhope - Rogers · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with ANN CARTER COWART
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-08 · Fairhope - Watts/Bahouth · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Michelle Cadden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-27 · Fairhope - Rogers · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Charlotte Holland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-04 · Fairhope - Kessler/Watts · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Cadden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-02 · Fairhope - Kessler/Watts · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Kaempfer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-26 · Fairhope - Rogers · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sarah Hollis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-02 · Fairhope - Rogers · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Denise Seale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-01-21 · Fairhope - Kessler/Watts · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Cadden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-07 · Fairhope - Kessler/Watts · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Cadden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
18.2%
4W–18L · 37.1% of games
3.0
6.2%
1W–15L · 24.4% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
10 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal