← Search

Dianna Gembler-Roberts

Boerne, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 57W–22L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Dianna Gembler-Roberts to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history79 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Shavettes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina OBryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-04 · Bandits · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Bond mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · Bandits · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Lowry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-13 · Sets in the City · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kacey Wernli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-12 · Sets in the City · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Viviane van Poppel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-02 · Love Hurts · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ekaterina Edrenkine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-27 · Shavano Un-4gettable · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Landry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-13 · Shavano Un-4gettable · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kacey Wernli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-30 · Shavano Un-4gettable · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kacey Wernli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-16 · Shavano Un-4gettable · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Hobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-03-07 · Love Hurts · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-04 · Love Hurts · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Viviane van Poppel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
82.9%
34W–7L · 65.4% of games
4.0
51.6%
16W–15L · 51.7% of games
7.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert