← Search

Eric Bond

New Braunfels, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 50W–25L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Eric Bond to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
W
2026-08-04 · Bandits · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dianna Gembler-Roberts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · JCC V Rangers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alex Echeverri mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
Jessey Martinez / Jeffrey Chang
2026-07-09 · Buzzed Bandits · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michelle DaCosta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-09 · JCC V Rangers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carmen Ahmed mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-27 · Bandits · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Wawrzyniak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · Diabolical Bandits · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lee Seidlits
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · Diabolical Bandits · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lee Seidlits
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-13 · Diabolical Bandits · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeffrey Santohigashi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Miguel Gonzalez / Marco Antonio Reyna
2026-06-13 · 8.5 Bandits · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brien Galon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-12 · Diabolical Bandits · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lee Seidlits
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-12 · 8.5 Bandits · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jason Finley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-17 · The Bandits · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ignacio Rivera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
64.1%
25W–14L · 54.5% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 71.6% of games
8.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 59.6% of games
8.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 50.5% of games
9.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
15 matches
#1 Singles
7%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer