← Search

Becca Beers

Birmingham, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 35W–28L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Becca Beers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
W
2026-09-12 · West Homewood - White/Hilsmier · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-09-08 · Hoover Met - Miller · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-10 · West Homewood - Bradley/Arnold · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Jane Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-27 · West Homewood - Bradley/Arnold · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Muha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-07-06 · West Homewood - Bradley/Arnold · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hazl Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-28 · BHRC - Dutton Spring 2026 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Xinyu Li mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-24 · West Homewood - Granger/Casey · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Gray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-02 · West Homewood - Granger/Casey · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Gray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-19 · West Homewood - Clark · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-2
L
2026-01-29 · West Homewood - Clark · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cassandra Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2025-11-15 · West Homewood - Beers/Sellers · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Hollis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-10-25 · West Homewood - Beers/Sellers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Jane Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
67.6%
23W–11L · 57.1% of games
3.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 47.5% of games
6.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.4% of games
3.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 55.3% of games
3.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#1 Singles
11%
7 matches
#2 Singles
11%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams