Mary Jane Armstrong
36 matches · 23W–13L · seasons 2025–2027
Captains: add Mary Jane Armstrong to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history36 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Teams27 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
70.4%
19W–8L · 57.6% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 44.9% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
5 matches
#2 Singles
11%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.