← Search

Chloe Todd

Madison, MS
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
37 matches · 13W–24L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Chloe Todd to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Todd, Chloe · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Katy Barham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-26 · Todd, Chloe · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lindsey Provenza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-05 · Todd, Chloe · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Anna Alderman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-14 · Vinson, Onsby · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mollie Katherine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-07 · Vinson, Onsby · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mollie Katherine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-30 · Vinson, Onsby · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Anna Kate Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-12 · Vinson, Onsby · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sorena Vinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-20 · Mangum, Emily · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Lindsey Shukla / Ashley Smith
2026-03-17 · Mangum, Emily · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Mangum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-03 · Mangum, Emily · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Kennedy Hand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-11 · Mangum, Emily · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-23 · Vinson, Onsby · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mary Hannah Marsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
36.4%
8W–14L · 46.6% of games
3.0
25%
2W–6L · 31.5% of games
5.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 45% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 49% of the time
#3 Doubles
49%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
4 matches
#1 Singles
11%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer