← Search

Emily Mangum

Brandon, MS
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 20W–69L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Emily Mangum to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Bryan, Emily · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kym Gore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-09-09 · Bryan, Emily · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Whitehead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-02 · Bryan, Emily · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Angie Pletzke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-27 · Bryan, Emily · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kym Gore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-19 · Bryan, Emily · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sallie Marie Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · Bryan, Emily · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Whitehead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-07 · Mangum, Emily · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Merry Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-29 · Mangum, Emily · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kristi Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-02 · Mangum, Emily · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Johnna Valentine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-19 · Mangum, Emily · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mary Parker Plunkett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-27 · Mangum, Emily · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Merry Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-20 · Mangum, Emily · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sallie Marie Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
35.5%
11W–20L · 45.8% of games
3.0
17.9%
5W–23L · 33.6% of games
5.5
15%
3W–17L · 39.7% of games
3.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 25% of games
6.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 37.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
20 matches
#2 Singles
8%
7 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer