← Search

Marie Romeo-Gough

— year-end
73 matches · 55W–18L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Marie Romeo-Gough to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
L
2026-08-15 · #4 Doubles · with Julie Barnola championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · #4 Doubles · with Julie Barnola championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Susan Lee / Satoko Tanimoto
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Jennifer Costa championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · with Jennifer Costa championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · with Jennifer Costa championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · with Laura Crain championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · with Jennifer Costa championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · with Jennifer Costa championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · Point Set, Crain · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Mattice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-5
L
2026-07-10 · Point Set, Crain/Siler · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sivan Chapman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-08 · LI: Point Set, Thomas/Simpson · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Costa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · Point Set, Crain · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Siler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Teams17 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 73.8% of games
3.5
60.9%
14W–9L · 55.1% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 62% of the time
#1 Doubles
62%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert