← Search

Julie Barnola

Farmingdale, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
192 matches · 101W–91L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Julie Barnola to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history192 matches
W
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Atara SImpson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-15 · #4 Doubles · with Marie Romeo-Gough championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · #4 Doubles · with Marie Romeo-Gough championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-30 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Whearty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-19 · LI: Point Set, Thomas/Simpson · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dora Wu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-01 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Massa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-30 · Roslyn, Goodman/Eitel (D) · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sharon Zuch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-29 · Lynbrook, Devine/Yousha · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mindy Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · Carefree, Kolenberg/Zander · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-06-23 · Roslyn, Goodman/Eitel (D) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sharon Zuch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-16 · Carefree, Kolenberg/Zander · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Perri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-15 · LB/PS, Simpson/Thomas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracey Gottlieb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
50.8%
62W–60L · 50.3% of games
7.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 53.8% of games
8.0
51.3%
20W–19L · 53.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
44 matches
#4 Doubles
21%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
39 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams