← Search

Tamara Cook

— year-end
48 matches · 19W–29L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Tamara Cook to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
W
2026-09-02 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cynthia Frederick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-29 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-07-24 · NJ GREEN · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cynthia Frederick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-04 · NJ ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janie Trevor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-05-21 · NJ ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shannon Hempelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-05-12 · NJ PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Kirby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-05-07 · NJ ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sara Quackenbush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-04 · NJ PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hope Yasbin Engel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-04-27 · NJ PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Kirby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Nancy Johnson / Kelly McDevitt
2026-04-20 · NJ PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-13 · NJ PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hope Yasbin Engel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-08-27 · NJ NAVY · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Maggie Gomer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
Teams17 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
54.5%
12W–10L · 53% of games
3.0
11.8%
2W–15L · 35.5% of games
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
11 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova