← Search

Janie Trevor

Arvada, CO
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 27W–28L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janie Trevor to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history55 matches
W
2026-07-13 · NJ BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nina Miranda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-29 · NJ BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Gatlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · NJ ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Townsel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-08 · NJ BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-04 · NJ ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tamara Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-05-21 · NJ ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Kirby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2024-08-26 · NJ BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Rimlinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-08-07 · NJ PINK · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Rimlinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2024-07-31 · NJ PINK · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Westfall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2024-07-29 · NJ BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carolyn Keim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2024-07-24 · NJ PINK · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Hempelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-07-22 · NJ BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Rimlinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
50%
23W–23L · 48.2% of games
6.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.3% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
15 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova