← Search

Gabriela Bottger

CAVE SPRINGS, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 27W–14L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Gabriela Bottger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
W
2026-08-13 · Teague/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Piper Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-03 · Teague/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Piper Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-24 · Neal/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brent Jimenez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-22 · Teague/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Piper Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-20 · Teague/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Piper Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-18 · Neal/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brent Jimenez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-17 · Neal/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brent Jimenez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · AR 3.5W 18 & Over (Letts) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Piper Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-19 · AR 3.5W 18 & Over (Letts) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-08 · Lasater/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cristina Rosas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-06 · AR 3.5W 18 & Over (Letts) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Piper Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-03-31 · AR 3.5W 18 & Over (Letts) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
81%
17W–4L · 61.3% of games
4.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 40.7% of games
4.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Singles, 24% of the time
#2 Singles
24%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
8 matches
#1 Singles
7%
3 matches
#3 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King