← Search

Natalie Mayer

— year-end
78 matches · 56W–22L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Natalie Mayer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
W
2026-08-30 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Whitney Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-29 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Samantha Thiede Erickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-06 · Donnell/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with MJ Schutz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-02 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tyler Quattlebaum mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-02 · Greaser-Larimer/Bentonville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with MJ Schutz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-30 · Donnell/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gretchen Pharis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0
W
2026-07-28 · Donnell/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Casey Tauber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-23 · Donnell/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-22 · Donnell/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with MJ Schutz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-19 · Greaser-Larimer/Bentonville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Hardin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-18 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffery Pederson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-08 · Rodgers-Edmiaston/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ronnie Adams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
88.9%
24W–3L · 70.5% of games
3.5
76.9%
20W–6L · 60% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 56.6% of games
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.1% of games
3.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 63.9% of games
3.5mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 35.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
14 matches
#2 Singles
13%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
7 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams