← Search

Katie Kilmer

— year-end
36 matches · 20W–16L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Katie Kilmer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
W
2026-06-25 · High Point/Tucker-Wise W3.5T · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · High Point/Tucker-Wise W3.5T · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-11 · High Point/Tucker-Wise W3.5T · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-04 · High Point/Tucker-Wise W3.5T · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-02 · High Point/Tucker-Wise W3.5T · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-07 · High Point/Tucker-Wise W3.5T · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Stephanie Smith
2026-05-01 · High Point/Tucker-Wise W3.5T · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
Stacey Williams / Alex Fergus
2026-02-20 · High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hilary Nagel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-13 · High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-12 · High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-06 · High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-02-04 · High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hilary Nagel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Teams14 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
80%
8W–2L · 65.5% of games
3.5
46.2%
12W–14L · 51.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 75% of the time
#1 Singles
75%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
5 matches
#2 Singles
8%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert