← Search

Allison Waldron

Forney, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 49W–18L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Allison Waldron to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
W
Elizabeth George / Nicole Roshto
2026-09-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with SHELLEY ARKELL
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-22 · Team 5 Kim Combs 7.5W · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Suzi Donaghe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-21 · Team 5 Kim Combs 7.5W · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Suzi Donaghe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-11 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-09 · Chandlers Landing/Campbell W3.5S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Stephanie Smith
2026-06-04 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-02 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-30 · Chandlers Landing/Campbell W3.5S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-14 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-05-09 · Chandlers Landing/Campbell W3.5S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
94.4%
17W–1L · 70.2% of games
3.5
71.4%
25W–10L · 61% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.6% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.7% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
10 matches
#2 Singles
12%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova