← Search

Jamie Huth

Tulsa, OK
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 24W–35L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Jamie Huth to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Coker-Woodson/LF/40&over3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jen Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-11 · Coker/LF/18s3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jen Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-16 · Coker/LF55s 6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jen Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-05-07 · Coker/LF/18s3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tamara McKillip
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-02 · Coker/LF55s 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacey Coker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-27 · Coker/LF/18s3.0W · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-25 · Coker/LF55s 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacey Coker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-21 · Coker/LF/18s3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jen Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-04-18 · Coker/LF55s 6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laura Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-13 · Coker/LF/18s3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jen Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-03-28 · Coker/LF55s 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jen Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-11-05 · Coker/LF/3.0 40s · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jen Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
56%
14W–11L · 52.3% of games
3.0
28.6%
8W–20L · 43.6% of games
6.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
14 matches
#1 Singles
17%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams