← Search

Jen Taylor

Tulsa, OK
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 24W–32L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Jen Taylor to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Coker-Woodson/LF/40&over3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Huth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-11 · Coker/LF/18s3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Huth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-16 · Coker/LF55s 6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jamie Huth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-05-13 · Coker/LF/18s3.0W · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-09 · Coker/LF55s 6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Kramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-27 · Coker/LF/18s3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alli McClain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-25 · Coker/LF55s 6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-21 · Coker/LF/18s3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Huth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-04-18 · Coker/LF55s 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Kramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-13 · Coker/LF/18s3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Huth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-03-28 · Coker/LF55s 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jamie Huth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-03-07 · Coker/LF55s 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Forbes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
75%
15W–5L · 61.5% of games
3.0
25%
7W–21L · 43.6% of games
6.0
25%
2W–6L · 40.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
13 matches
#1 Singles
9%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams