← Search

Jill Briggs

Rose Valley, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 31W–14L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jill Briggs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
W
2026-05-28 · Rose Valley Smasholinis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Stancill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-0, 1-0
W
2026-05-21 · Rose Valley Smasholinis · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Stancill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-2
W
2026-05-07 · Rose Valley Smasholinis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ellen Merwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-16 · Rose Valley Smasholinis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joan OConnor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-18 · The Smasholinis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Sheehan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-5
W
2026-02-11 · The Smasholinis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with MaryBeth Alvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-01-07 · The Smasholinis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Glowacki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-12-17 · The Smasholinis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Sheehan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-06-19 · WSARC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Hemmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-06-12 · WSARC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Hemmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-06-05 · WSARC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzanne Goodstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-01 · WSARC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Hemmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
66.7%
20W–10L · 57.4% of games
3.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 54.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
9 matches
#1 Singles
9%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova