← Search

Catherine Krauss

Downingtown, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
132 matches · 54W–78L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Catherine Krauss to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history132 matches
L
2026-05-16 · The Young & the Rest of Us · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judy Cecco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-3
L
2026-05-14 · Whitford · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judy Cecco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-11 · Whitford Ladies · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Wakelee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-09 · The Young & the Rest of Us · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Datz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-03 · Whitford Ladies · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Martini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-02 · The Young & the Rest of Us · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Datz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-23 · Whitford 3.5 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Berghuis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-16 · Whitford · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kate Steimel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-04 · Sweet Shots · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teri Gabrys
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-18 · Sweet Shots · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kerry Lundmark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-2
L
2026-01-21 · Sweet Shots · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kerry Lundmark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-03 · Sweet Shots · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kate Steimel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
48.1%
50W–54L · 48.3% of games
3.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 36.3% of games
7.0
6.2%
1W–15L · 31.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
23 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova