← Search

Philip Qualls

— year-end
48 matches · 19W–29L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Philip Qualls to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
W
Travis Motichek / David Williams
2026-09-09 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Billy Beasley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-07-11 · Schulze/18s/3.0/NC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Payton Harrell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-19 · Schulze/18s/3.0/NC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Casey Culbreath mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · Schulze/18s/3.0/NC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey Palmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · Schulze/18s/3.0/NC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christin Vilardo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-11 · Schultze-18/3.0/M/N Cypress · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caleb Mcdonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-04-08 · Schultze-18/3.0/M/N Cypress · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Connor Seale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-08 · Schultze-18/3.0/M/N Cypress · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-25 · Schultze-18/3.0/M/N Cypress · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caleb Mcdonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-16 · Schultze-18/3.0/M/N Cypress · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Connor Seale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-04 · Schultze-18/3.0/M/N Cypress · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brad Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-09-13 · Schulze 18/5.5/M/N Cypress · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Luis Angel Perez Roman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Teams13 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 63.5% of games
3.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 44.5% of games
5.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 55.5% of games
2.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
16.7%
2W–10L · 39.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
9 matches
#2 Singles
8%
4 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert