← Search

Cari Eissler

Austin, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 43W–19L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Cari Eissler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
W
2026-08-08 · Waterloo TC · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Josh Bohls mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · Waterloo TC · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Josh Bohls mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · Racquet Riot 3.0 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · Racquet Riot 3.0 Spring · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristen Gilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · Racquet Riot 3.0 Spring · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-13 · Racquet Riot 3.0 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-12 · Racquet Riot 3.0 Spring · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · Waterloo TC · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with George Deshazo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · Racquet Riot 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie van Zee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-05 · Racquet Riot 3.0 Spring · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-25 · Racquet Riot 3.0 Spring · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Bradfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-04-25 · Racquet Riot 3.0 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 67.1% of games
3.0
73.9%
34W–12L · 61.7% of games
6.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#1 Singles
7%
4 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer