← Search

John Fisher

— year-end
48 matches · 28W–20L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add John Fisher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
L
2026-08-08 · Berry Next Point 6.0 55 Mixed · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dana Polk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-06 · Berry Next Point · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jana McCown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-25 · Berry Next Point 6.0 55 Mixed · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dana Polk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · Berry Next Point · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dana Polk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-21 · Berry Next Point · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dana Polk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-31 · Berry Next Point · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dana Polk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Charlie Burgess / NATHAN GAINES
2026-04-14 · Team Maximus · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig McGehee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
Mike Indergard
2026-04-07 · Team Maximus · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-31 · Team Maximus · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-03-22 · Berry Next Point · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dana Polk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-03-21 · Berry Next Point · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Peter Wachholz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
Mike Indergard
2026-03-17 · Team Maximus · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 67.6% of games
3.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.4% of games
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
66.7%
16W–8L · 58.2% of games
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#1 Singles
13%
6 matches
#2 Singles
8%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams