← Search

Amanda Rice

Midlothian, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 40W–11L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Amanda Rice to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
W
2026-09-09 · ACAC Verbalettes - Jones · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-08-29 · ACAC Krebs/Bivins · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Winckler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-6
W
2026-08-26 · ACAC Tandett · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Kasten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-25 · ACAC Verbalettes - Jones · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-23 · ACAC Krebs/Bivins · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Kellner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · ACAC Verbalettes - Jones · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-05 · ACAC Verbalettes - Jones · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-08-01 · ACAC Krebs/Bivins · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melody Morton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-29 · ACAC Verbalettes - Jones · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3
W
2026-07-26 · ACAC Krebs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brittany Krebs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-24 · ACAC Tandett · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Hornbeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 58.8% of games
3.5
91.7%
22W–2L · 67.7% of games
6.5
40%
2W–3L · 46.9% of games
5.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 43% of the time
#1 Singles
43%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
6 matches
#2 Singles
10%
5 matches
#3 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova