← Search

Susan Winckler

— year-end
36 matches · 12W–24L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Susan Winckler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
L
2026-08-29 · ACAC Krebs/Bivins · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amanda Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-6
W
2026-08-15 · ACAC Krebs/Bivins · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joanne Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · ACACBartholomew · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beverly Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-26 · ACAC The Slice Girls Lutterbie/King · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Pommersheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-20 · ACACBartholomew · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beverly Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-16 · 2 ACAC OLSON · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Blackburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · ACACBartholomew · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Theresa Bartholomew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-11 · ACAC The Slice Girls Lutterbie/King · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-07-09 · 2 ACAC OLSON · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Blackburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-08 · ACACBartholomew · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Margaret Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-27 · ACAC The Slice Girls Lutterbie/King · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erika King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · 2 ACAC OLSON · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teresa Ilnicki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 48.4% of games
3.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 43.9% of games
6.0
40%
2W–3L · 47% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.7% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 47% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert