← Search

Ashton Scarborough

Belden, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 62W–24L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Ashton Scarborough to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Z Park Combo · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Cooper Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-25 · Z Park Combo · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Liz Couturiaux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-25 · Huffstatler 18+ 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Briley Clement
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-21 · Huffstatler 18+ 6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Briley Clement
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-11 · Scarborough · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elizabeth Barnitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-04 · Scarborough · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kayla Reynolds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · Scarborough · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nena Lowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-02 · Scarborough · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elizabeth Barnitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-28 · Scarborough · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nena Lowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Jeremy Taylor / Joy Whittle
2026-07-19 · Burleson/Barnitz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Neal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
Jason Smith / Kristi Martin
2026-07-12 · Burleson/Barnitz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jody Lindsey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-08 · Scarborough · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Zuelzke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
75%
24W–8L · 65% of games
3.0
75%
12W–4L · 61% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 33.8% of games
5.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 64.8% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 46.7% of games
3.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 58.1% of games
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
19 matches
#1 Singles
11%
9 matches
#2 Singles
11%
9 matches
#3 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova