← Search

Arian Waldrop

BELDEN, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 48W–36L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Arian Waldrop to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-08-21 · Beck/ Burk 6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Adelyn Kneip
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
Carley Johnston / Amanda Sullivan
2026-07-26 · Edwards · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Danielle Burk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · Jamie Lindsey 18+ mixed · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Benjamin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-12 · Jamie Lindsey 18+ mixed · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Benjamin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Edwards · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Danielle Burk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-23 · Arian Waldrop · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Browning mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · Jamie Lindsey 18+ mixed · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Lindsey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-03 · Arian Waldrop · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glynn Stone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-11 · Tammy Chapman · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-05 · Burk 3.5W 40+ TCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alicia Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-04-30 · Lindsey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Burk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-26 · Lindsey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alicia Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
60%
6W–4L · 50.6% of games
3.5
71.9%
23W–9L · 60.1% of games
4.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 43% of games
6.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 34% of games
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.9% of games
3.5mixed
90%
9W–1L · 58.7% of games
4.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 34.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
24 matches
#1 Singles
21%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
11 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer