← Search

Pamela Calaquian

— year-end
264 matches · 151W–113L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Pamela Calaquian to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history264 matches
L
2026-08-30 · Smash & Splash · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Higgins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-15 · NJD/Straight Sets · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-12 · Smash & Splash · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fabio Shuyama mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Kristina Baldovino championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · NJD/Straight Sets · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Wescoe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-05 · Pennsbury Peacocks · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gena Maresca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-10 · Courtageous · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Lowney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-03 · Courtageous · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Lowney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-19 · SPRING CENTRAL/Ace Angels · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Milner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
RASESH SHAH / Sarah Weiner
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · with Scott Grossman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-0
W
2026-05-05 · SPRING CENTRAL/Ace Angels · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Bohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
Teams31 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
85.7%
18W–3L · 64.3% of games
3.5
63.5%
73W–42L · 54.4% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 36.9% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
51.3%
20W–19L · 49.8% of games
7.5mixed
29.4%
5W–12L · 44% of games
8.0mixed
50%
14W–14L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
76 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
74 matches
#1 Singles
12%
31 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer