← Search

Jim Dailey

Ann Arbor, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 51W–21L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jim Dailey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
W
2026-08-26 · HV-Watson 7.5 COMBO MIX F · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michelle Famurewa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-08-10 · HV-Watson 7.5 COMBO MIX F · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christine Hume mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-21 · RCAA-Shaw 18s 4.0M F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Pirooz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Steven Lim / Steven Millard
2026-07-16 · HV-Brewer 40s 4.0M F1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rakesh Latchamsetty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-14 · RCAA-Shaw 18s 4.0M F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Pirooz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · RCAA-Shaw 18s 4.0M F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Raymond Aldrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-18 · HV-Brewer 40s 4.0M F1 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with James McKinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · HV-Brewer 40s 4.0M F1 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lyn Loeffler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-28 · HV-Brewer 40s 4.0M F1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denis DSouza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-17 · RCAA-Shaw 18s 4.0M F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Rhodes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-14 · HV-Brewer 40s 4.0M F1 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Clarke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · HV-Clarke 40 MEN SINGLES F · #3 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
77.8%
14W–4L · 65.2% of games
4.0
73.9%
17W–6L · 55.7% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 26% of the time
#2 Doubles
26%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
16 matches
#3 Singles
8%
6 matches
#1 Singles
7%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams