← Search

Frank Manley

Ann Arbor, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
167 matches · 113W–54L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Frank Manley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history167 matches
L
2026-08-04 · LIB-Arthur 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ashley Mooney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-31 · LIB-Arthur 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Molly Lipham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Victor Nambo / Joshua Stutesman
2026-07-21 · LIB-St Pierre 18s 4.0M F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Kanpurwala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-17 · LIB-Arthur 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ruedee Vance mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-14 · LIB-St Pierre 18s 4.0M F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Szymanski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
N/A
2026-07-13 · LIB-Briceno 40s 4.0M F1 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Szymanski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-07 · LIB-St Pierre 18s 4.0M F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Arthur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-23 · LIB-St Pierre 18s 4.0M F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Arthur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-06-19 · LIB-Arthur 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vanessa Roche mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · LIB-St Pierre 18s 4.0M F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Juri Jacoby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-21 · LIB-Briceno 40s 4.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Szymanski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-17 · LIB-St Pierre 18s 4.0M F2 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 73.3% of games
3.5
69%
29W–13L · 59.6% of games
4.0
38.5%
10W–16L · 48.8% of games
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 81.4% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 67.6% of games
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 72.3% of games
6.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 62.1% of games
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 54.4% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
33 matches
#1 Singles
15%
25 matches
#2 Singles
7%
11 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe