← Search

Mark LaRose

— year-end
99 matches · 52W–47L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Mark LaRose to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
W
2026-09-09 · MTC - Denson 40+ · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Singleton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-09-03 · MTC - Denson 40+ · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-02 · MTC - Denson 40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with James LaRose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-12 · MTC - Denson 40+ · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with James LaRose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-21 · MTC - Nimityongskul/Cabral · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Varin Nimityongskul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-2
W
2026-07-14 · MTC - Nimityongskul/Cabral · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Aaron Stricklin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-13 · MTC - Nimityongskul/Cabral · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Varin Nimityongskul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-01 · Oakwood - Cabral/Kendall · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Davis Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-17 · Oakwood - Cabral/Kendall · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Reeve Cabral
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-10 · Oakwood - Cabral/Kendall · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with James Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-06-09 · MTC - Nimityongskul/Cabral · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Adam Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · Oakwood - Cabral/Kendall · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
Teams30 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
60.4%
32W–21L · 55.2% of games
3.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 28.6% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 56.4% of games
6.5
40%
6W–9L · 52.2% of games
3.0mixed
50%
10W–10L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
17 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer