← Search

Natalie Musser

— year-end
76 matches · 54W–22L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Natalie Musser to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
W
2026-09-11 · Racquet Club 4 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Henn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-06 · Racquet Club 1 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Allison Hargrove
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-26 · Racquet Club 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gretchen Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-24 · Racquet Club 5 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Stieg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-15 · Racquet Club 1 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Simran Parmar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-04-13 · Racquet Club 1 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Nimjee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-3
W
2026-04-12 · Racquet Club 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nadia Malik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-30 · Racquet Club 1 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Andrea Wofford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-03-27 · Racquet Club 5 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gretchen Gaible
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-02-27 · Racquet Club 5 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nadia Malik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-1, 0-1
W
2026-02-22 · Racquet Club 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nadia Malik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-02-20 · Racquet Club 5 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alex Texler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Teams18 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 62.6% of games
3.0
64.8%
35W–19L · 59.5% of games
5.5
100%
7W–0L · 76.6% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
14 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe