← Search

Andrea Wofford

Columbus, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
154 matches · 83W–71L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Andrea Wofford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history154 matches
L
Ashley Graber / Mary McGuff
2026-07-29 · Scioto CC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Natalie Knezevic
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · Scioto CC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jenny Reed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · Scioto CC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Natalie Knezevic
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-08 · Racquet Club 4 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mackenzie Rine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-04 · Racquet Club 1 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jamie Henn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-3
L
2026-05-01 · Racquet Club 4 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sabina Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Emily Smith / Heather Schumm
2026-04-17 · Racquet Club 4 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sabina Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-10 · Racquet Club 4 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sabina Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-4
W
2026-04-03 · Racquet Club 4 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mackenzie Rine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-30 · Racquet Club 1 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Natalie Musser
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · Racquet Club 4 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Cain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-27 · Racquet Club 4 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mackenzie Rine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 65.4% of games
3.0
44.6%
25W–31L · 51.4% of games
3.5
54.7%
29W–24L · 49.5% of games
5.5
63.6%
14W–8L · 54.8% of games
6.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
37 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer