← Search

Elizabeth Lofaro

Kihei, HI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 32W–26L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Lofaro to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
L
2026-06-21 · The Net Set · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jan Bryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-14 · The Net Set · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sonia Kreag
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-07 · The Net Set · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jori Spencer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-30 · The Net Set · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
Ramona Sakamoto / Rebecca Marshall
2026-05-25 · #1 Doubles · with Shannon Sayles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-2
W
2026-05-24 · #3 Doubles · with Shannon Sayles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-3
W
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · with Shannon Sayles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-1
L
2026-04-11 · MCC Mixed Madness · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Leander mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-3
W
2026-04-04 · MCC Mixed Madness · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yeshua Goodman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
Maggie Mittendorf
2026-02-18 · Maui Match Makers · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-14 · MCC Wahines · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tesha Newman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-02-01 · MCC Wahines · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mina Welch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
80%
12W–3L · 67.5% of games
3.5
30%
6W–14L · 39.7% of games
6.0
60%
3W–2L · 50.6% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
9 matches
#1 Female Doubles
14%
8 matches
#1 Singles
7%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer