← Search

Heath Hilliker

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
95 matches · 46W–49L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Heath Hilliker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Ki.Manning40C5.5 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Meredith Russo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-30 · St.Fogarty18C5.5 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lisa Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-26 · Ki.Manning40C5.5 · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Laura Wingo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-24 · St.Fogarty18C6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melissa Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-23 · St.Fogarty18C5.5 · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lisa Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · Am.Brandon18S · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-12 · Ki.Manning40C5.5 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Shannon Aumer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-08-02 · St.Fogarty18C5.5 · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Meredith Russo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-27 · St.Fogarty18C6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elisebeth Gelardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · St.Fogarty18S · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-12 · Th.Pullara18M · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lawrence Hilliker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · Th.Pullara40M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lawrence Hilliker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
53.3%
16W–14L · 52.8% of games
3.0
45.2%
14W–17L · 47.3% of games
5.5
68.4%
13W–6L · 58.8% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 39.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
20 matches
#2 Singles
8%
8 matches
#3 Singles
5%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova