← Search

Jill Dykes

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 57W–50L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jill Dykes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
L
2026-07-13 · Je.Wolborsky18T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Sielaty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-07-11 · Je.Wolborsky40S · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-09 · Je.Wolborsky40M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Dykes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-08 · Je.Wolborsky40S · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-06 · Je.Wolborsky18T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Norma Wolcott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-29 · Je.Wolborsky18T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Wolborsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-25 · Je.Wolborsky40M · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Dykes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-22 · Je.Wolborsky18T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lora Barnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-11 · Je.Wolborsky40M · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Dykes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-13 · Je.Wolborsky40A3.0 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-05 · Je.Wolborsky40A3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Fielitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
Megan Black
2026-05-04 · Je.Wolborsky18A · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
57.5%
42W–31L · 54.7% of games
5.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 42.9% of games
6.5
0%
0W–4L · 34.2% of games
3.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 49.4% of games
6.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 54.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 27% of the time
#2 Doubles
27%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
23 matches
#2 Singles
21%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
15 matches
#1 Singles
12%
13 matches
#3 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe