← Search

Jessica Speicher

NEWBURGH, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 64W–20L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Jessica Speicher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
W
Margot Roehrborn
2026-09-08 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-27 · KY/HEN/CONRAD, Dawn · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandy Harpenau
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-27 · KY/HEN/CONRAD, Dawn · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandy Harpenau
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
Jean Carver / Emily Hamilton
2026-08-22 · KY/HEN/MELANIE · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Julie Flittner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
Pamela Marshall / Emily Hamilton
2026-08-21 · KY/HEN/MELANIE · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Julie Flittner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
Lorien Appman / Emily Hamilton
2026-08-06 · KY/HEN/CONRAD, Dawn · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Randi Conrad
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-28 · Flittner · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-30 · Flittner · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Flittner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-23 · Flittner · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Flittner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-21 · Flittner · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christie Rheinlander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Emily Ozete
2026-06-09 · Flittner · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-22 · Flittner (Evv Spring Women's 6.5 Combo) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Woodyard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 63.4% of games
3.0
100%
9W–0L · 72.4% of games
3.5
67.7%
21W–10L · 55.9% of games
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 69.3% of games
7.5
66.7%
18W–9L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
36 matches
#1 Singles
20%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova