← Search

Jane Quehl

Newburgh, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
146 matches · 78W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jane Quehl to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history146 matches
L
2026-08-30 · KY/HEN/INGALLS, Liz · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stacy Lambert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · KY/HEN/INGALLS, Liz · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Natalia Fletcher
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-02 · KY/HEN/INGALLS, Liz · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Monica Warren
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Jennifer Obert / Mike Obert
2026-07-19 · KY/HEN/PALMER, Todd · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Todd Palmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · KY/HEN/OBERT, Jennifer · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Quehl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-14 · Conrad · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Conrad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Jessica Speicher / Christie Rheinlander
2026-06-21 · Conrad · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Newland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
Katrina Cutshaw / Grace Hodge
2026-06-16 · Conrad · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Lambert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Donna Spencer / David Spencer
2026-06-14 · KY/HEN/PALMER, Todd · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jim Quehl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Ellen Rendle / Kaleb Rust
2026-06-11 · KY/HEN/OBERT, Jennifer · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Quehl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
Rachel Beier / Daria Sevastianova
2026-06-09 · Conrad · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Lambert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
Amelia DeMello / Charles Mcelroy
2026-06-07 · KY/HEN/PALMER, Todd · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jim Quehl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
56.2%
59W–46L · 51.6% of games
6.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 53.4% of games
7.5
0%
0W–6L · 33% of games
3.0mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 51.1% of games
3.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
19 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert