← Search

Carrie Watterson

Daphne, AL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 16W–29L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Carrie Watterson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
W
2026-09-14 · Lott Park - Lieb/Smith · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
Khanh Nguyen / Theresa Perry
2026-08-17 · Lott Park - Lieb/Smith · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Montz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · Lott Park - Lieb/Smith · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Molly Cunningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-23 · Lott Park - Lieb/Smith · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Krissy Dermody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-5
L
2026-04-13 · Lott Park - Lieb/Wilson · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-30 · Lott Park - Lieb/Wilson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Denise Hoffman / Sarah Thomas
2026-03-22 · Lott Park - Lieb/Wilson · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Chappell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-09 · Lott Park - Lieb/Wilson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-04 · Lott Park - Lieb/Smith · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
Mary Moore
2026-02-13 · Lott Park - Lieb/Smith · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-11 · Lott Park - Lieb/Smith · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-28 · Lott Park - Lieb/Smith · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 65.7% of games
3.0
25%
6W–18L · 37.2% of games
5.5
20%
2W–8L · 42.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 36% of the time
#1 Singles
36%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#2 Singles
7%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova