← Search

Meredith Davis

— year-end
73 matches · 42W–31L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Meredith Davis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
L
2026-03-04 · Lake Forest - Shirley/Middleton · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Shirley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-26 · Lake Forest - Daniel · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-02-25 · Lake Forest - Shirley/Middleton · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-02-12 · Lake Forest - Daniel · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-02-11 · Lake Forest - Shirley/Middleton · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-01-28 · Lake Forest - Shirley/Middleton · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-01-23 · Lake Forest - Shirley/Middleton · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-01-21 · Lake Forest - Shirley/Middleton · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-01-19 · Lake Forest - Daniel · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-01-07 · Lake Forest - Shirley/Middleton · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Daniel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-12-01 · MO - Rogers/Daniel · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-11-19 · MO - Rogers/Daniel · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Teams21 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 57.1% of games
3.0
58.5%
31W–22L · 54.8% of games
3.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 47.8% of games
5.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.4% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
20 matches
#2 Singles
22%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
12 matches
#1 Singles
15%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert