← Search

Justin Metz

— year-end
20 matches · 13W–7L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Justin Metz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history20 matches
W
2026-08-15 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-3
W
Neel Virdy
2026-07-25 · Cedar Sprint · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-16 · Cedar Sprint · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Maddocks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-02-16 · Hamdani - Ace Kissers · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Terry Tate
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-12-07 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matthew Holubecki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-5
L
2025-11-20 · Cedar Sprint · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ali Hamdani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-02 · Cedar Sprint · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ben Winik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
Jonathan Jones / James Chapman
2025-05-04 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Riley Huffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-11-23 · Cedar Sprint · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Uddhav Shishodia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-11-03 · Cedar Sprint · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ben Winik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-09-21 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Samuel Fontanez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-5
L
2024-07-20 · Cedar Sprint · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-5
Teams10 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 57.6% of games
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 48.8% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
6 matches
#2 Singles
20%
4 matches
#3 Singles
20%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
2 matches
#1 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe