← Search

Andrew Maddocks

Washington, DC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 48W–30L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Andrew Maddocks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
W
2026-08-22 · Cedar Sprint · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ali Hamdani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-21 · Cedar Sprint · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · Cedar Sprint · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aaron Ohmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-27 · Cedar Sprint · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-17 · Cedar Sprint · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ali Hamdani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-16 · Cedar Sprint · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Metz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-03 · Smooth Strokes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aaron Blackmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · Cedar Sprint · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kenta Goto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-02 · Cedar Sprint · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paul Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-4
W
2026-04-26 · Cedar Sprint · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paul Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-25 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kenta Goto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-19 · Smooth Strokes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ali Hamdani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
60%
6W–4L · 55.6% of games
4.0
75%
24W–8L · 59.8% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 59.8% of games
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.3% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.6% of games
8.5mixed
0%
0W–5L · 33.7% of games
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
13 matches
#1 Singles
12%
9 matches
#3 Singles
10%
8 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal