← Search

CC Shellabarger

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 20W–6L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add CC Shellabarger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
W
Lauren Smith / Tiffany Schenberger
2026-07-02 · EAnderson (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Caroline Skjoedt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-17 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-10 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-06-03 · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-28 · EAnderson (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Caroline Skjoedt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-08 · EAnderson (Queens) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-03-25 · EAnderson (Queens) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-04 · EAnderson (Queens) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-10-14 · #2 Doubles · with Caroline Skjoedt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
Katrina Richards / Jill Smith
2025-10-01 · EAnderson (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rachel Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-09-24 · EAnderson (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rachel Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-09-17 · EAnderson (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with RACHEL Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 63.4% of games
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.4% of games
3.5
80%
8W–2L · 65% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
8 matches
#2 Singles
31%
8 matches
#1 Singles
23%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
8%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
1 match
#3 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer